I am wondering if and in which way we can and have to speak of changes in the academic world.
Putting it into a question one could ask:
Can living in the academic world be compatible with working academically?
It has something religious – similar to the questions, leading to and accompanying the Reformation, criticizing the institutionalised church in order to rescue faith.
It has something ancient philosophic-economical, where we find the contrast of Oikonomia, roughly use-value oriented and resource-respecting management of the household and Chrematistike, roughly the exchange-value oriented money-making, money becoming as fetish a use-value.
If we are generously accepting that different sides are justified, instead of insisting on a romanticised ideal, there still remains the
cui prodest, cui bono?
To be precise, it is not just the question who benefits. Centre-stage we have to ask
Where do we find systemically and what are the leading motives?
Looking at the distribution of income within the sector of Higher Education is revealing. And understanding that this is not the only sector where power is abused is frightening. And that power is often abused not just for private benefits, but where dependents are guided into wrong directions is a disgrace …
And there are still people speaking about freedom of thought and speech? Well, we see, it is not just a matter of a finger …, it can also be about having a different approach or uncovering injustice or speaking about it. And then people hear they should think outside of the box …?